Archive for September, 2006

h1

Seafdec and German Dev’t Service findings on Guimaras corals

September 30, 2006

WELL, my wish has been granted. There is an independent study, albeit a rapid assessment, of the coral reef in Guimaras.

Click studyofcoralreefsatsouth-eastguimaras.pdf

And contrary to Siliman University’s Dr. Angel Alcala’s group findings, this report by the Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center based in Iloilo and local representatives of an agency of the German government, indicates that the corals in Guimaras have been affected by the oil spill. In fact they have been producing mucus, a sign that the corals are disstressed.

So which report is more accurate? I’m betting on Seafdec and the Germans.

Source: Project Sunrise. Another study, a BFAR assessment of seagrass in Guimaras is also available on that web site.

h1

Corals

September 30, 2006

angel1.jpg
Angel Alcala
Malaya

AFTER we came back to the Silliman campus on the 27th of August from our trip to Guimaras Island to assess the damage of the August 11, 2006 bunker oil spill off the island, we announced that mangroves and beaches were the ecosystems badly affected by the spill but the submerged coral colonies did not show external evidence of oil sticking to them. When asked by the press, radio announcers and television stations a few days later, we confirmed this negative finding on corals.

But we were aware that seeing no oil sticking to the coral skeletons is different from saying that the corals were not affected by the spill. And we made sure that this message was clearly stated in our responses to questions from the press and in our assessment report sent out before the 12th of September.

Based on our observations on corals in the past we had known that stressed corals respond to attacks of predators, and possibly to chemical pollutants in seawater, by producing mucus. Mucus production is therefore an indicator of stress. In the 1980s, I published observations on branching Acropora producing mucus when grazed upon by Drupella shell. Based on this knowledge, we have stated in our assessment reports that we have to continue observing corals in badly oil-affected sites on Guimaras because we had expected that the remaining oil on beaches and in mangrove lagoons will eventually leach out to sea and possibly affect reef-forming corals as well as other organisms.

When I received a text-message from a friend who was presumably on Guimaras on the 8th or 9th of September saying that he had observed mucus on corals in affected sites, I knew we had to investigate the report immediately. This prompted me to mobilize our research group for a visit to Guimaras. For some reasons, that planned trip was postponed, so I had to assemble and send another research group from my Center (SUAKCREM) with instructions to conduct a detailed scientific survey complete with adequate controls. This survey team left for Guimaras on the early morning of Saturday, September 16th.

(For the full piece, click Corals, Sept. 30, 2006.)

—————————————————————————————-

Please take note that Dr. Alcala’s group was the one hired by Petron Corp. to study the oil spill’s effects on Guimaras’ marine resources. As you can see, the findings of the study, as well as his responses to comments on the validity of his group’s findings, are neither here nor there.

What Guimaras needs is a really independent scientific study, unpaid by any entity with vested interests in downplaying the oil spill, to determine the accident’s actual impact on the oil spill.

h1

Agency asked to start seaweeds rehab program in Guimaras

September 30, 2006

By Erwin Ambo S. Delilan

NOTING that the waters of Guimaras has rapidly improved after a month-long cleanup from the worst-ever oil spill in the country, a top ranking Western Visayas official has requested the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (Bfar) to start its seaweeds rehabilitation program in the island-province.

Concurrent Presidential Adviser for Western Visayas and Task Force Solar Oil Spill (SOS) Commander Rafael “Lito” Coscolluela said he requested Bfar to conduct a special assessment to determine if the province’s oil-affected seas could already support its seaweed farming program anew.

“Then, we also asked Bfar to start its seaweed rehabilitation program,” he said.

On Monday next week, Coscolluela said a four-man team from BFAR will be conducting an intensified inspection and assessment on the output of the cleanup.

“Then, we will wait for their recommendations on whether or not the evacuees will be ordered to return home and whether or not to start the rehabilitation programs for the seaweeds, coral reefs, fishing grounds and mangroves,” he said.

(For the full story, click Sunstar, Sept. 30, 2006.)

h1

From our mailbox…indie filmmakers on Guimaras (UPDATED)

September 29, 2006

picture-628-resized.jpg
Oil on rocks by Victor Villanueva

Dear Friends,

WHAT: The television broadcast of 16 shorts films of different types(narrative, documentary, experimental) on the Guimaras Oil Spill, 4 minutes each by 16 filmmakers (including moi) from Luzon, Visayas and
Mindanao

WHERE: SHORTS (special episode)
Istilong Iba, Indie Pelikula
ABC 5

WHEN: MOVED TO OCT. 8!!!
no time advised yet

(Read this blog for further announcements on event.)

Please check them out.

Please keep watch on Guimaras and the surrounding islands of Panay, Negros and Iloilo.

Please keep helping.

Please don’t take the so-called “experts” words on it at face value. Get out there and find out for yourself first-hand.

trying to stay true with love,

JP

P.S. For a preview, please check out the stills taken by filmmaker
Victor Villanueva from Cebu.

P.P.S. For background on the project please check out this Inquirer article.

(via anjuli)

h1

Petron cover-up?

September 28, 2006

capino21.gif

IT seems that with the waning of national media coverage of the Guimaras oil spill from the sinking of MT Solar 1, Petron’s interest and ardor for the clean-up of the oil sludge washed upon Guimaras province’s former pristine beaches and mangrove forests have also greatly diminished.

This is lamentable since it is indisputable that Petron has the responsibility to clean up the mess created by the spill. For one, MT Solar 1 was carrying Petron’s bunker fuel bound for Zamboanga from its refinery in Bataan and also the Special Board of Marine Inquiry investigating the Solar 1 sinking has identified Petron as one of those responsible for the accident for allowing the overloading of Solar 1.

Petron has of course disputed the findings of the Board of Marine Inquiry about the overloading but it cannot escape responsibility for the cleanup and for compensating the fishermen and other Guimaras residents, whose livelihood had been adversely affected by the Solar 1/Petron oil spill.

It’s good that local media have remained vigilant in reporting Petron’s sins of commission and omission in the aftermath of the oil spill which is the worst in Philippine history and which no less than President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo herself has proclaimed as a national disaster.

One of the more galling stories about Petron’s “clean-up” effort is the one reported by David Israel Sinay in the Sept. 19 issue of Panay News, where he detailed the accusations of the head teacher of an elementary school in Barangay Tando, Nueva Valencia against Petron. Barangay Tando is one of the areas worst hit by the oil spill.

(For the full story, click Mla. Standard Today, Sept. 29, 2006.)

h1

UP to form legal, economic team on Guimaras

September 28, 2006

INQ7.net, Sept. 28, 2006

THE University of the Philippines is forming a team of legal and economic experts to determine liability for the Guimaras oil spill and what legal action the university could take.

Marvic Leonen, the UP vice president for legal affairs, said the team would be drawn from the UP system, particularly UP Diliman and UP Visayas, and would include valuation experts to compute the damage.

“We’ve been affected twice, the Semirara and Guimaras spills … We have marine reserves that are used for research,” Leonen told a forum on the legal aspects of the oil spill in UP Diliman.

He did not reveal who the team members were nor the charges being readied in connection with the Guimaras spill.

A rapid assessment report completed by the Silliman University on August 30, 19 days after the spill, placed the potential annual losses from fishery products because of damage to mangroves at 30 million pesos, and from loss of wood products at 1.6 million pesos.

The UP Visayas will come out with its three-month rapid assessment report in November. The school maintains the official information database on the spill. It has obtained a 100-million-peso, 10-year grant to help in the rehabilitation of Guimaras.

h1

Chemical dispersant used in Guimaras oil spill more harmful—DOST

September 28, 2006

By Helen Flores
The Philippines Star, Sept. 27, 2006

THE Department of Science and Technology (DOST) confirmed yesterday that the chemical dispersants used in containing the Guimaras oil spill may cause more harm to the already distressed area.

Dun sa katanungan na ang chemical dispersants na ito ay mas toxic, actually totoo ’yun (It’s actually true that the chemical dispersants are toxic),” Dr. Jaime Montoya, executive director of the Philippine Council for Health Research and Development (PCHRD), of the DOST, said during a press conference at the Hotel Kimberly in Malate, Manila.

Montoya made the statement in reaction to a scientific study conducted by Silliman University, which cautioned against the use of chemical oil dispersants in cleaning the oil spill.

Reports said that the research team found that “the effects of dispersants on living organisms are worse that the actual effects of the oil spill.”

Montoya, however, said that the agencies concerned in containing the oil spill should weigh the risk and benefit of using chemical dispersants.

The Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) used chemical dispersants to clean up the oil spill in Guimaras.

Lahat ng ginagawa natin sa siyensya at medicina laging may harm yan, sa gamot may side effects pero kailangan mo laging isipin na dapat yun benepisyo na gusto mong makuha should outweigh the risk or the harm (All we do in the field of science and medicine has some harm, medicines have side effects, but you have to think that the benefits you desire should outweigh the risk or harm),” he stressed

He said the issue of using the chemical dispersants is now being debated upon.

“Does it actually outweigh the potential harm to the ecological environment?” Montoya said, adding that these chemicals would eventually reach shore and the people who would be exposed to them.

Montoya added that there are no really “global experts” in this case because it is rarely happening in any country.

He said the experiences of other countries in handling oil spills are the government’s basis of response.

He also said that there are other ways of treating the oil spill, like the use of coconut and corn husks as oil absorbents.

Maraming substitutes, dapat alamin kung anong pinakamaganda ’yun ang dapat asikasuhin, importante dito maaddress natin ’yun problema taking into consideration not only the actual oil spill itself but its acute and long-term effect in the environment and the population,” he said.

The M/T Solar I, carrying more than two million liters of bunker fuel, sank off Guimaras waters on Aug. 11 causing the country’s worst-ever oil spill.

h1

Proposals for Solar 1 siphoning operations evaluated

September 28, 2006

The Philippine Star 09/29/2006

PROPOSALS for siphoning the remaining oil in Solar I from salvage contractors are now being evaluated, an official of the International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund, 1992 (1992 Fund) said yesterday.

Joe Nichols, deputy director of the 1992 Fund, said Shipowners’ P&I Club and 1992 Fund were evaluating the proposals.

The 1992 Fund, an intergovernmental organization based in London, and Shipowners’ P&I Club, the third party insurers of Solar I, will be the ones to provide compensation for oil pollution damage within the framework of two international conventions.

The conventions cover damages resulting from spills of persistent oil from tankers.

The final decision on whether the cost of siphoning the oil from the sunken tanker is covered by the conventions would be made by the 1992 Fund’s executive committee, which meets on the week of Oct. 23.

This was confirmed by Guimaras oil spill incident commander Rafael Coscolluela. He said that once the 1992 Fund has contracted a salvaging company for the operations, it would also take about four to six weeks to deploy offloading vessels and equipment. Another two months would lapse before all the remaining bunker oil is sucked out of Solar I.

“We cannot rush the offloading. We have to plan and prepare, and take the proper precautions. Safety and reduced risk is important,” he said.

According to the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) commander for Western Visayas, Capt. Luis Tuason, there are only four companies capable of offloading the oil. He, however, declined to name these foreign companies.

Meanwhile, the Shipowners’ P&I Club is pressing ahead with the necessary preparation for a siphoning operation to minimize delay, pending a decision by the executive committee.

“The siphoning of oil from a tanker 630 meters underwater is a very complex operation and requires very detailed planning. With the vessel’s proximity to sensitive environmental resources, we have to be very careful to ensure that any siphoning operations do not cause further damage,” Nichols said in a statement.

The PCG is also doing its own preparation for the offloading operations. Tuason said they will be laying out ocean spill booms in case the offloading operations go awry and oil is released into the waters.

“The only enemy (of offloading operations) is the weather and the strong current,” Tuason said.

In a presentation to the National Disaster Coordinating Council earlier this month, based on the report from the survey vessel Shinsei Maru, the 1992 Fund said that Solar I was deeply embedded in mud on the seabed and was therefore in stable condition. As such, there was little likelihood of a major release of oil in the short term.

Representatives of the Shipowners P&I Club and the 1992 Fund have also conducted oil pollution claims and compensation workshops in Guimaras aimed at assisting victims of the incident to process claims. — Ronilo Pamonag

h1

Task Force Special

September 28, 2006

By Tara Katherine Yap in Guimaras

NO ONE saw it coming—that a tanker, carrying over two million liters of bunker fuel, would sink, much more cause environmental, health, and socio-economic hazards that have never been seen in this country before.

The government was caught off-guard. As a result, the management of the oil spill disaster in Guimaras and its neighboring areas has been marked by confusion. It is unclear who really calls the shots as there are too many officials and agencies involved and they operate in a multi-layered organization, including three task forces: Task Force Guimaras (national), Task Force Solar 1 Oil Spill (regional), and Task Force Sunrise (provincial).

The response to Guimaras is similar to the evacuation of Filipinos in Lebanon. Instead of tapping an existing and tested inter-agency crisis management committee, President Arroyo formed a task force headed by the vice president which worked separately from a presidential committee on Middle East preparedness and the Department of Foreign Affairs.

The emergencies in Guimaras and Lebanon reflect the leadership style of Ms. Arroyo. Journalists who have covered her say that the President usually forms special bodies to deal with emergencies to show that the national government is responding. The message, they say, is the creation of the task force itself.

During the first week, only the municipality of Nueva Valencia, under Mayor Diosdado Gonzaga, and the regional Coast Guard responded. They handled the rescue operation of the crew of the ill-fated M/T Solar 1 and notified the concerned private and government agencies.

(For the full story, click Newsbreak October 9, 2006 issue online.)

h1

‘SILENT KILLER’

September 27, 2006

Microbiologist warns oil spill workers of long-term effects

By DAVID ISRAEL SINAY
Panay News, Sept. 27, 2006

GUIMARAS – Residents cleaning up shores stained with bunker oil are in great peril and may not be aware of the slow but long-term fatal effect of their exposure to toxic fumes, a microbiologist warned.

Many residents of oil spill-affected villages here are availing themselves of Petron Corp.’s “cash for work” scheme.

According to Mary Aidine Galvan, a microbiologist associated with the Philippine Reef and Rainforest Conservation Foundation, Inc., inhaling vapors from bunker oil-stained shores is more dangerous than physical contact of the raw bunker fuel. It may result to hypoxia or anoxia, she said.

Hypoxia is a condition wherein there is decreased oxygen supply to the brain even though there is adequate blood flow.

Galvan said hypoxia is characterized by inattentiveness, poor judgment, memory loss, and a decrease in motor coordination.

Brain cells are extremely sensitive to oxygen deprivation and can begin to die within five minutes after oxygen supply has been cut off. When hypoxia lasts for longer periods of time, it can cause coma, seizures, and even brain death, Galvan revealed.

On the other hand, cerebral anoxia is the lack of oxygen to the brain. If severe, Galvan said it can cause irreversible brain damage.

Less severe cases can cause sensory distortions and hallucinations. Some researchers have cited cerebral anoxia as the cause of near-death experiences.

“Susceptible folks are the elderly, asthmatic, and those with respiratory ailments,” Galvan said.

The Petron-chartered Solar 1 tanker sank on August 11 in the Guimaras Strait. It contained over two million liters of bunker fuel.

“The tar balls (the withered residue compound of the bunker fuel) are recalcitrants. They stay longer in the environment and are more toxic than freshly spilled oil,” Galvan told Panay News.

Galvan, also a member of the Society of Conservation Biology of the USA, Marine Section, said tar balls, asphaltine and resins, which are persistently occurring, are hard to degrade residues. These are caused by wave action bringing (bunker fuel oil) sediments onshore covered by sand, leaving an anaerobic condition.

“Anaerobic condition produces hydrogen sulfide and noxious gasses,” Galvan explained.

Microbes can convert these noxious gasses such as methane, ethanol and alcohol and subsequently produce carbon dioxide. But Galvan said gases emitted from the shores may trigger (above normal level of) methane gas to bind with the body’s hemoglobin.

Coupled with the oxygen-binding capacity of the blood, this may result to hypoxia and anoxia.

BIOREMEDIATION

Galvan said bioremediation could have been applied when the bunker fuel oil was still fresh onshore.

“Bioremediation should be used to deal with withered residues like tar balls, asphaltine and resins,” she said.

At present, the microbiologist said, there is no technology available in the country on how to deal with the residues.

“Chemical dispersing is all that they recommend,” she lamented.

If tar balls are left untreated, it will harden and can make things worse, she warned.

Though the sea has indigenous hydrocarbon degraders (IHD) that could neutralize or breakdown oil, Galvan said these are not enough to battle the oil spill due to the viscosity of the bunker fuel.

Petron’s bunker fuel oil is a highly viscous material, Galvan said.

MORE DEATHS

As of yesterday, the Department of Health (DOH) has reported three deaths linked to the oil spill. Just recently, a “cash for work” worker died.

It is believed that his death was caused by too much exposure to — and inhalation of — toxic fumes.

Thirty-seven-year-old Ernesto Belonio of Brgy. San Antonio, Nueva Valencia town died Friday last week. But DOH-6 Regional Director Lydia Depra-Ramos said yesterday that the results of their investigation is not yet available.

In yesterday’s press conference of the Task Force Guimaras, it was learned that residents diagnosed with signs and symptoms related to the oil spill already swelled to 1,855 persons – 1,776 in Guimaras and 79 in Iloilo province.

DOH said a total of 32 consultations were conducted and 10 were admitted to hospitals.

Ramos said further that they have not yet requested for air examination since they are still “waiting for the improvement of the coastal cleanup operations” being conducted by Petron.

“We already moved the residents to higher grounds,” she said. DOH ordered the evacuation of residents living within 100-meter radius of the shores due to the above normal levels of toxic fumes.

h1

After the oil spill, what to do now

September 26, 2006

Letter to the Editor, Inquirer

THE oil spill off Guimaras reflects the insincere commitment of some corporations to social responsibility and the government’s failure to fulfill its regulatory role.

The oil spill should be properly called the “Petron/Solar 1 Oil Spill” to establish proper accountability.

It has been more than a month since the oil spill. The northeast monsoon (“amihan”) will soon start and this could spread the oil further to the south of Guimaras and west of Guimaras Strait, thus affecting more coastal areas. Current efforts to remove the oil spill from the beach merely provide cosmetic relief: the oil spill is only 1/10th of the Solar’s total cargo; the bulk of the 2 million liters of bunker fuel is still leaking from the sunken tanker at a reported 120 liters a day. Unless the remaining oil in the tanker is removed or siphoned, the cleanup activities will only expose villagers to health hazards.

The government and the regulators of the shipping industry are likewise accountable for the Petron/Solar oil spill. By giving the MV Solar 1 clearance to sail, despite clear violations of regulations, the concerned government agencies clearly failed to fulfill their responsibility.

We call on Petron Corp. and the owner of Solar I, Sunshine Maritime Development Corp., to:

. Expedite the removal of the MV Solar I from the sea or the siphoning of its remaining cargo of bunker oil;

. Desist from conducting workshops on indemnification and recognize the role of local government units and civil society to lead such processes;

. Indemnify the people of Guimaras for the long-term ecological damage, the loss of livelihood opportunities and the immediate and long-term effects on public health; and

. Uphold corporate social responsibility by adhering to the highest safety standards and ethical practice in their operations.

(For the entire piece, click After the spill, Sept. 26, 2006.)

h1

Visayas governors to push tanker removal

September 26, 2006

BY CARLA GOMEZ
Visayan Daily Star, Sept. 26, 2006

PRESIDENTIAL Adviser for Western Visayas Rafael Coscolluela yesterday assured that the government is committed to remove the sunken bunker fuel on board MT Solar I.

He also assured that the rules on the use of chemical dispersants are being enforced by the Coast Guard to accomplish its goal of dispersing the tanker’s oil spill while still at sea rather than risks its reaching shore where it can become a bigger problem.

“If the dispersants are used according to guidelines the potential damage on the environment is minimized,” Coscolluela, head of the Solar Oil Spill Task Force, said.

The Oil Pollution Compensation Fund executive committee is meeting in London in October to come up with a final decision on when and how to extract the bunker fuel on board MT Solar 1 that sank in the Panay Gulf on Aug. 11, he said.

The IOPC is an inter-governmental group that provides compensation for oil pollution damage resulting from taker spills.

The MT Solar 1 sank with 2.1 million liters of bunker fuel, the bulk of which is at the bottom of the sea, while the oil spill it has caused has hit the coasts of Guimaras and Iloilo and is threatening Negros Occidental.

Negros Occidental Gov. Joseph Marañon yesterday said the governors of the Visayas are meeting in Manila on Oct. 4 where he expects they will come out with a collective position demanding the immediate removal of the sunken fuel.

It is the obligation of the owner of MT Solar 1 and Petron to remove the sunken fuel and we have the right to demand it, he said.

Coscolluela said the national government is committed to the removal of the sunken bunker fuel and is for its being siphoned out.

The Philippine government is, however, waiting for the IOPC to come out with its decision on the process, he said.

We will try to emphasize to them the urgency of the need to come up with some action before the change in the direction of the monsoon winds, he said.

If the IOPC does not come out with the decision for the removal of the sunken fuel then the Philippine government will undertake it itself, he said.

As to the alarm raised that oil dispersants will cause more harm than good to marine life, Coscolluela said “we raised such concern ourselves sometime ago and it has been addressed”.

As much as possible we do not want to use the dispersants but it was a choice between that or allowing the oil spill to hit shores and cause more damage, he said.

In order for dispersants not to be damaging to the marine life he said it must not be used in depths of 100 feet and near the shore, and the chemicals used must be accredited by the Coast Guard, he said. He said the dispersants are now being used at depths way beyond 100 feet, he said. If there were any other way to avoid using chemical dispersants we would do it, he said.

h1

Bravo Petron!

September 26, 2006

THE P80M PR war chest certainly has come in handy. Imagine managing to infiltrate a major Philippine daily with its lies in the guise of an ‘investigative report’ by its reporters?

Notice how the paper’s stories on the oil spill only quote experts provided by Petron? Sad that it’s reporters didn’t bother to interview independent scientists or environmentalists, which could have given their report a real independent and investigative feel. (Yeah, WWF is an ‘independent’ environmental group. Not in the Philippines that’s for sure.)

You be the judge, readers. I’m not going to waste precious space on this blog by reprinting those Petron ‘praise’ releases here.

Btw, we hear the going rate for hacks in the employ of Petron is now P3000 a week, according to a blogger down south. No wonder these paid hacks are now sporting the latest fashion and audio trends on their person. Tsk, tsk, tsk…if only they knew how much their silence and slanted reports are actually worth. P3,000 a week…ang cheap nyo naman!

I hear the actual budget is P5,000 a week…of course, guess who gets to pocket the P2,000 difference? But c’mon you paid hacks, don’t you think your pro-Petron efforts should be worth at least P10,000 a week? Well as the blogger down south says…Greed makes you stupid.

h1

CBCP head okays ‘boycott Petron’ calls

September 26, 2006

By Nestor P. Burgos Jr.
Inquirer, Sept. 25, 2006

ILOILO CITY – Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) president Angel Lagdameo has called for the immediate removal of the remaining bunker fuel from the sunken tanker Solar I.

Lagdameo, the Archbishop of Jaro, said he was even “inclined to agree” to calls to boycott Petron products to pressure the giant oil company to expedite the removal of the oil and tanker.

He said the main concern, aside from helping the affected residents, was the removal of the vessel and its cargo from the waters of Guimaras.

“Our hope and prayer is that they will be able to remove the threat by siphoning off the oil and eventually re-floating the vessel that contains the oil,” said Lagdameo in a press conference here Saturday.

Lagdameo urged the government, Petron Corp. and the owners of Solar I, Sunshine Maritime Development Corp., to “come together and put their acts together to address this very, very important concern which threaten the lives of the people of Guimaras.”

(For the full story, click Boycott Petron.)

h1

Enhancing Guimaras’ coral reefs through coral gardens

September 26, 2006

The Philippine STAR 09/24/2006

THE Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) is set to establish coral gardens in five areas in Guimaras this year, BFAR Director Malcolm I. Sarmiento Jr. said in line with President Arroyo’s directive to make the oil spill-damaged province another tourist destination.

Based on the underwater assessment conducted by the composite team of BFAR biologists and scuba divers last month, potential sites were identified in the coastal waters of Panobolon, Inampulogan, Guiwanon, Unisan and in Yato Island.

“BFAR will install artificial reef modules composed of 7 feet x 10 inches x 8 inches cement bars where branching or quick growing corals and coral-like species could attach themselves,” Sarmiento said.

In this way, the fish productivity in the area will be improved as coral reefs serve as nursery and breeding grounds for various fish and shellfish, he added.

According to Sarmiento, a total of P10 million has been earmarked for the project which was already incorporated by the BFAR in its 2006 calamity fund budget.

The introduction of coral garden concept was piloted by BFAR at Puntod Reef in Tangalan, Aklan where the coral cover was found to be devastated by destructive fishing activities such as the use of hulbot-hulbot and dynamite fishing.

Today, the live coral cover in Tangalan has significantly recovered and improved from 12 percent in 2002 to around 45 percent in 2006. Aside from contributing significantly to improve the fish landed by local fisherfolk, the project area is now a tourist destination with increasing number of foreign and local divers frequenting the area.

Meanwhile, 10 multi-purpose boats have been donated by BFAR to hardest-hit municipalities of Guimaras to address the urgent need for their livelihood.

Likewise, 50 units of bottom-set gill nets, 50 units of squid jiggers have already been awarded to fishefolk engaged in near-shore fishing such as shellfish gatherers, oyster and seaweed farmers who were adversely affected by the MT Solar 1 oil spill through the local government units.

BFAR has also turned over some of eight tons of oil absorbent material composed of abaca rope and scrap nets donated by the commercial sector that were used in the construction of oil spill boom in the province.

As a member of the National Disaster Coordinating Committee for the Guimaras rehabilitation, BFAR is continuously extending assistance to the oil spill containment and clean-up, and ensuring seafood safety by monitoring landed marine products.

A module of an AR made by piling concrete bars. A total of fifty modules were installed in the pioneering 10-hectare coral garden project in Tangalan by BFAR.

A BFAR-trained fisherfolk assessing coral development in the AR module a year after its installation in Tangalan. (Press release)

h1

Evacuation continues due to oil spill

September 26, 2006

By Nestor P. Burgos Jr.
Inquirer, Sept. 25, 2006

NUEVA VALENCIA, Guimaras – The number of residents forced to leave their homes because of toxic fumes from the oil sludge continues to rise as officials quarantine the affected villages.

The Guimaras provincial social welfare and development office reported that the total evacuees reached 258 families or 1,111 persons as of September 20.

The local government evacuated the residents from five villages of Nueva Valencia and two villages in Sibunag.

These include 67 families and 326 persons in evacuation centers and 191 families and 785 persons who are staying with their relatives.

The evacuation started last August 30 after results of air samplings showed a high level of toxicity of the environment in the areas worst hit by the oil sludge.

The residents depend on the government and private donors for food.

Novelita Tayupon, 40, said her family receives 7.5 kilograms of rice and six cans of sardines as their ration for three days. She has four children aged 3 to 9 years old.

The officials brought them from their house along the coast of the village of Tando last week and transferred them to the makeshift quarters at the perimeter of the village plaza. Twenty-five other families stay in the plaza and in two tents beside it.

h1

Oil debris now in Misamis

September 26, 2006

LUGAIT, MISAMIS ORIENTAL – An estimated 1,000 tons of oil debris collected from the coastal areas of Guimaras province arrived at the Holcim port here on Saturday on board two barges.

The oil debris were gathered from the Aug. 11 oil spill caused by the sinking of MT Solar I tanker off southern Guimaras Island.

Bobby Sajonia, vice president of British-owned cement company Holcim, told reporters that the oil debris will be loaded to the kiln burner.

The byproduct of the burning process will be integrated in the cement processing stages, Sajonia said. Richel V. Umel, Inquirer Mindanao, Sept. 25, 2006

h1

Solar I siphon efforts to begin in 4 weeks, DND chief says

September 25, 2006

THE government expects to begin operations to siphon off the remaining oil inside the sunken tanker MT Solar I in about four weeks time, Defense Secretary Avelino Cruz Jr said Monday.

Cruz, head of Task Force Guimaras, said involved government agencies were able to arrive at this schedule after speaking with representatives of the International Oil Pollution Compensation (IOPC) Fund.

“The director of the IOPC fund has recommended to the executive committee of the IOPC fund that they approve the compensation of the siphoning of the oil from the sunken vessel,” Cruz said.

The defense chief expressed optimism that the siphoning will begin “on the third week of October” when the IOPC executive committee takes up the matter.

He added that, “They (IOPC officials) have estimated the cost and because of the amount of oil still in the sunken vessel, plus the fact that that area is in an earthquake fault line.”

(For the full story, click Siphoning in 4 weeks, Sept. 25, 2006.)

h1

DENR chief twits experts’ study, says dispersants safe

September 25, 2006

By JOAN DAIRO, GMANews.TV

CONTRARY to experts’ findings and an admission by the Coast Guard, Environment Secretary Angelo Reyes said Monday the government’s use of chemical dispersants to contain the oil spill in central Philippines was ecologically safe.

Reyes said the dispersants are applied in “deep waters” and therefore would not affect marine life usually found in shallow waters.

Reyes was interviewed after a briefing on the proposed P7.02-billion budget of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) for next year.

“The apprehension on the concern that these dispersants would cause damage (to Guimaras’ marine life) is more of a perception than reality because the Coast Guard is applying these dispersants only in waters that have depths in excess of 100 feet,” said Reyes, a former military officer.

He said data from the regional office of the DENR indicate that “chemical dispersants would affect [the marine life] only if they are being used in deep waters. So there is no damage there.”

(For the full story, click DENR chief, Sept. 25, 2006.)

h1

CBCP urges people to boycott Petron

September 25, 2006

By Ronilo L. Pamonag
The News Today, Sept. 25, 2006

WHILE local officials backtracked on their plan to boycott products of Petron Corporation, a Catholic priest who is highly vocal on social issues is urging consumers to boycott the giant oil company.

“It would seem to us that nothing has been done,” Msgr. Meliton Oso, director of the Jaro Social Action Center, said on Saturday, referring to the oil spill.

Oso, who writes for church publication Candlelight, said that he will call on consumers to boycott Petron starting today, when his new column will be published.

“In my second column which will come out tomorrow, I am urging everyone in Iloilo to join me in boycotting Petron until they retrieve or recover M/T Solar 1 from the bottoms of the sea,” Oso said in a press conference at the Archbishop’s Palace.

Oso said that he has already “registered my own simple attempt to boycott Petron” in an earlier column.

Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) president, Jaro Archbishop Angel Lagdameo expressed support for Oso’s call to boycott the oil refiner.

“I am inclined to agree with that (boycott),” said Lagdameo, who was also present during the press conference.

He said that boycotting Petron products is but one way of forcing the oil giant to deal with the problem.

Lagdameo said that Petron Corporation and Sunshine Maritime Development Corporation, the owner of the sunken tanker, must offload the remaining oil and refloat Solar 1.

Petron and SMDC, he added, must be united in addressing the oil spill.

Oso said that they will be forming a multi-sectoral group that would look for ways to force Petron to retrieve the remaining industrial oil from the tankers containers.

h1

I-TEAM REPORT: The last moments of Solar I

September 25, 2006

THERE WERE UNSPEAKABLE moments of horror as the crew valiantly but vainly tried to stop the MT Solar I from swaying violently from side to side in stormy seas before the oil tanker gave up the ghost, flipped over, and slowly sank to its chilly grave 630 meters on the sea floor south of Guimaras Island.

This chilling but heroic tale of bravery and tragedy at sea was pieced together by experts on board the Shinsei Maru, a Japanese research ship commissioned by Petron Corp. to send a remote-operated vehicle (ROV) to the Solar I’s final resting place to figure out what happened and what to do next.

The last moments of the Solar I were put together by experts from the firm, London Offshore Consultants Pte. Ltd., who interviewed the crew of the ill-fated tanker and reviewed video footage of the sunken ship taken by the ROV submersible. A copy of the report was made available to the Inquirer.

The Solar I was loaded with 2.19 million liters of industrial fuel oil from Petron when it departed Bataan on Aug. 10 on its way to Zamboanga del Sur. The tanker experienced heavy seas and sought shelter north of Guimaras in the early hours of Aug. 11.

The report:

“On inspection, damage was found on the [bow] resulting in [water entering] the motor room, cargo gear room … and the chain lockers … Repairs were [done] including the sealing of [an] air pipe by inserting a wooden plug into the open pipe.

(For the full story, click Last moments, Sept. 25, 2006.)

h1

I-TEAM REPORT: Sprays vs oil slick raise alarm bells

September 25, 2006

Chemical dispersants peril Guimaras marine life

By Leila Salaverria, TJ Burgonio
Inquirer

(First of a series)

THE PHILIPPINE COAST Guard’s use of chemical dispersants to clean up the worst oil spill in the nation’s history has caused alarm among environmentalists who fear that it may cause more harm than good to marine life.

Since the MT Solar I sank in choppy waters off Guimaras Island on Aug. 11 and dumped into the sea an estimated half of the 2.19 million liters of industrial fuel oil it was carrying, the Coast Guard has sprayed 115,600 liters of dispersants in a bid to contain the damage.

The operation 24 km off Guimaras continues as small amounts of oil continue to trickle out of the tanker lying at the bottom of the sea.

Task Force Guimaras, headed by Defense Secretary Avelino Cruz Jr., has yet to make a final decision on a plan to siphon off the remaining cargo of oil the vessel was ferrying for Petron from Limay, Bataan, to Zamboanga del Sur.

PCG officials acknowledged that the chemical dispersants could have adverse effects but said their use prevented far greater damage because they stopped the oil from reaching land and damaging more marine resources.

Already, a significant amount of slick had lapped at the coastal areas of Guimaras and Iloilo provinces, coating mangroves, animals, rocks and tourist resorts with a black sludge.

(For the full story, click Alarm bells , Sept. 25, 2006.)

h1

Maritime Week: A Greasy Odyssey

September 25, 2006

IN MY PACK By Ruth G. Mercado
The Freeman 09/25/2006

WHAT do Guimaras, Doña Paz and Ivory Coast have in common? Grease. Maritime week commemorations this year is expected to wallow in mires of pollution crisis issues. But it will not be as murky as it seems. Nor will it be too slippery as to elude attention or too slimy as to justify inaction. It will instead bring to surface many misdemeanors that if left concealed, blurred and sealed may turn a crisis into an odyssey of catastrophes.

All this time, oil – from which the transport industry derives its lifeblood – has been moved and shipped in precarious and notorious ways. Like a symptom-less disease that is not detected until a person’s vital organs break down, no one would have known the risky and complacent manner by which oil and petroleum products in this country are handled, until the Guimaras oil spill.

In fact, no one would have known that maritime disasters in this country involving oil tankers far exceed tragedies involving passenger and cargo ships combined.

If not for the sinking of oil tanker MT Solar I in August where thousands of gallons of bunker fuel wiped out stretches of marine sanctuaries and beach resorts in Guimaras and neighboring islands, no one would have known that hazardous petroleum products are being shipped in decrepit tankers. No one would have known that oil shipments are intercepted or have mysterious rendezvous at mid-sea where oil is siphoned, smuggled or transferred to another vessel. No one would have known that all this time, the Philippines does not have laws regulating oil shipment and oil tankers, anti-oil pollution laws and laws that penalize people or entities liable for oil spills.

Such realization ought to sludge us with shame because the MT Solar I is not the first oil tanker involved in pollution or maritime disasters. In 1987, the MT Vector carrying thousands of gallons of petroleum collided with passenger ship MV Doña Paz off the coasts of Marinduque killing at least 4,000 passengers and crew. The Coast Guard’s inquiry board ruled that the oil tanker was not seaworthy and that it may have traveled without navigational lights making it difficult for the passenger ship to detect the approaching tanker on radar.

But while heirs of tragedy victims were indemnified with multi-million-peso damage claims, nothing was done to regulate oil shipment in this country. In its 1988 decision, the Board of Marine Inquiry blamed the MT Vector as solely responsible for the tragedy, but did not recommend anything that would have changed oil shipment practices or phase out single-hulled oil tankers. The inquiry fell short of preventing another accident, which happened almost 20 years later. This time far, far more devastating that it prompted Coast Guard to tag the Solar I sinking as “the worst oil spill.”

Also in August, thousands of miles from Guimaras, an equally “worst” toxic waste scandal happened. In West Africa’s Ivory Coast, a mixture of oil residue and caustic soda used to rinse out tanks of a Greek-owned cargo ship caused nausea, rashes, fainting, diarrhea and headaches. Dutch-based multi-national trading company Trafigura, that operates Probo Koala cargo ship, hired Ivorian firm Tommy to dispose of the sludge. But Tommy dumped an unknown proportion of 500 tons at 11 public sites across the city on August 19 and 20, making thousands of residents ill and killing seven including four children.

No matter how tough Ivory Coast’s anti-pollution laws are, these did not seem fail-safe. Eight people including transport officials, heads of Tommy and two other Ivorian companies were arrested. Outraged residents shouting “Murder” protested and set up barricades on the streets.

It’s time Philippine maritime and transport authorities discern from the Ivory Coast experience and siphon out grease from grime, industry malaise from crime. Unless oil shipment and tanker regulation are discussed extensively during forums this week, the next maritime pollution tragedy won’t come in 20 years – it may just be a breath away.

h1

Heat, discomfort hound evacuated Guimaras kids

September 25, 2006

By HAZEL P. VILLA
Panay News, Sept. 25, 2006

NUEVA VALENCIA, Guimaras – It may indeed be a sunny day but for some 98 pupils of the Paaralan ng Buhay ng Tando, laughter and playfulness mask their discomfort as they try to make the best out of makeshift classrooms since the overpowering smell of rotten eggs drove them out of their school by the seashore.

School since August 22 for Day Care and Grades 1 and 2 is the chapel of the Catholic Church, the Aglipay chapel for Grades 5 and 6 and a tarpaulin tent for Grades 3 and 4.

The heat is almost unbearable and some 15 minutes of staying in the tent, though under the shade of coconut trees, makes one perspire on top of a discomfiting feeling brought about by topsy-turvy chairs and noisy children.

“It is so hot here. I tell the kids, let us bear this. Just keep on fanning yourselves. We can’t afford not to hold classes,” said Priscila Galvan, teacher in-charge of the multi-grade school.

She and two of the school’s three teachers were sitting at the outskirts of the tent during recess, fanning themselves as their wards noisily played outside.

The only portable blackboard had only a few scribbles on it.

RETREAT

Galvan said they had no choice but to retreat to the interior of Brgy. Tando here 11 days after Petron-chartered M/T Solar 1 sank off the southern part of Guimaras carrying 2.19 million liters of bunker fuel oil.

Some of the spilled 1.3 million liters washed on the white sand shores of Tando and other beaches of Nueva Valencia, Sibunag and San Lorenzo – three towns of Guimaras hardest hit by the country’s worst oil spill.

In the days that they stayed in their campus some five to eight meters away from the beach, Galvan said six pupils in Grades Five and Six complained of headaches, and tightening of the chest.

Grade One pupil Jeilyn Albaña and Grade Five and Six teacher Gemma Garde vomited.

Galvan said they did not transfer to the interior of the village right away because the children had to finish taking their first grading periodic exams.

The school children and teachers were given medicines, said Galvan, but the worse was yet to come.

When the school children transferred, the workers hired by Petron constructed a tent made of tarpaulin sewn together which leaked during rainy days, but this was nothing compared to the stench of what Galvan said was a drum of chemical dispersants near the tent.

WORSE SITUATION

“Petron’s chemical dispersants were smelly. People won’t die from the bunker fuel oil, but they will die from the smell of the dispersants. The drum was open and the stench was a pain in the chest,” said Galvan.

The teacher added that after their complaints sometime in the last week of August, Petron did not use the chemical dispersants and had these taken away.

“We are now immune to the stench,” said Galvan.

Petron’s health, safety and environment manager Carlos Tan, has repeatedly denied that the corporation ever used dispersants in the shorelines of spill-affected villages.

He also told the Inquirer it was the first time he heard of the state of the evacuated school children and that he would have workers fix the tent.

“The ones who provide the relocation sites are the local governments, not us,” said Tan on September 17.

SLOPPY WORK

Galvan was also incensed with the sloppy work of Petron-hired workers who “painted” with cement on the second week of September – the school’s breakwater made of rocks and corals that were smeared with oil.

Even a coconut tree by the breakwater with its broad roots awash in oil was “painted” with cement, to the great consternation of Galvan who could not explain the logic of it all.

“The clean-up workers told me it was Petron who ordered them to cover the breakwater with cement but Petron’s supervisors denied it when we confronted them. They said they will work on the breakwater again but I could still see some oil because of the thin film of cement,” said Galvan.

Tan said Petron was not the only group doing clean-up operations in Tando, mentioning “private individuals” and volunteer groups from Iloilo who took it upon themselves to help.

“The workers we get are residents and hence, we expect them to do well because after all, this is their place and they would not resort to shortcuts,” said Tan.

WISH FOR COMFORT

Galvan said she and the teachers wished all classes could be held in one big comfortable tent with electric fans, but as to who would pay for the electricity is something that even Brgy. Captain Olivia Evangelista could not answer.

Tando, with its 204 households and a population of more than a thousand, has some nine families or about 45 people evacuated to the interior of the village around the plaza on Sept. 13 since they lived within 100 meters of the shoreline ordered off limits by the government.

The evacuation came after a preliminary health and environmental assessment conducted by the Department of Health in collaboration with the University of the Philippines National Poison Management and Control Center dated August 28 showed toxic levels of hydrogen sulfide in the air of villages Cabalagnan, La Paz, and Tando in Nueva Valencia.

The high levels of hydrogen sulfide resulted to the sickness of 25 adults and four children in these villages, said the report.

The top five clinical complaints in the three villages, according to the report, were dizziness (65.5 percent), headache (44.23 percent), body malaise (34.48 percent), numbness (31.0 percent) and cough (24.13 percent).

As it is now, life for the pupils of the Paaralan ng Buhay ng Tando remains bleak.

h1

Unwanted: Guimaras ‘mousse’

September 24, 2006

By Ma. Diosa Labiste
Inquirer Visayas

THE “chocolate mousse” in the Guimaras oil spill is not a delectable dessert.

The globules of oil and water are products of emulsification formed by a mixture of small droplets of oil and water while being tossed by waves.

Water entering the viscous oil blobs further makes the “chocolate mousse” sticky and less free flowing. The blobs sink, giving the false impression that it is gone and the threat to the environment has ended.

Scientists say the clean-up operations of the Aug. 11 oil spill caused by the sinking of the MT Solar I tanker carrying 2.1 million liters of bunker fuel oil off southern Guimaras may have removed the unsightly blanket of black matter on the beaches of some coastal villages, but its effects remain.

Bunker fuel oil is toxic, viscous, corrosive, pollutive and persistent and does not degrade rapidly. In fact, chemical dispersants are not effective against it.

(For the full story, click Guimaras mousse, Sept. 23, 2006.)

h1

Watch a rock concert on Sept. 30 and help Guimaras

September 24, 2006

FOR P200, you get a free beer, listen to the country’s hottest rock bands, and help save one of the most beautiful island provinces in the Philippines.

GUIMARAS NEEDS YOU. LEND A HAND.

lendahand-resized-2.jpg

A big thank you to Roy Alberto and Joseph Araneta for mounting this gig. Mabuhay kayo!

h1

Youngblood : Interconnected

September 23, 2006

By Rosanna Naig*
Inquirer
Sept. 22, 2006

I AM no superhero. If I were one, we would be living in a totally different world.

I wrote my first essay on environmental awareness more than a decade ago, when I was in Grade 6. I won 500 pesos for my piece. It was about dreaming of a world where there was no pollution, no diseases, no poverty, no corruption, no disasters, a world where Mother Earth was the No. 1 priority, not politics, not money, not even our own interests. It was how an 11-year-old girl conceived a beautiful Earth made real by our efforts to take good care of what nature gave to us.

I am not writing this piece to win another competition. I don’t even expect everyone to spare the few minutes it takes to finish reading it. I just want to bring back the little voice of the 11-year-old girl who believed that all of us are responsible for what happens to the world we live in.

My heart goes out to the children of Guimaras and nearby islands of Western Visayas. They might never see how splendid their beaches once were. They might never get to enjoy the rich marine life that their seas once offered. They might never even get to fulfill their dreams because their parents’ source of livelihood has been damaged by a green grime of oil.

I grew up loving the sea and the beaches of Antique. My father, a teacher and part-time farmer and fisherman, went out of his way to let us experience nature’s wonders and bounty. Sometimes he would wake us up at 5 in the morning to go fishing. This meant rowing the boat out to sea, casting the net and pulling it up after an hour. My siblings and I enjoyed the fresh smell of the sea, while watching the sun rising. I can say that those are the few things from my childhood that can’t be purchased with money.

Greenpeace has called the worst oil spill in our country a “ticking time bomb.” There is so little time to contain the damage. It will take years to clean up the mess and even then Guimaras will not be the same heaven that it was before. The oil slick is spreading over the clear and rich waters surrounding the island, ruining the mangroves and the marine wildlife for which it is quite well known. Gone are some of the beautiful, white beaches that the place once offered as a come-on to tourists. Gone are the days when children can have fun day after day on its beaches. They can’t even go swimming anymore. Gone are the fishing grounds and many will be going hungry for months or even years to come.

Greenpeace’s website has a story about a boy in Grade 6 who wishes that the oil will go away so that he can catch fish and swim in the sea again. I have read about a father who wonders where he will go and what he will do to bring food to his family now that he cannot go fishing. I have seen pictures of whole beaches and mangrove forests covered by oil. Those trees were planted by the people and now all their efforts have gone for naught. Some of them have been afflicted by allergies. A handful are said to have died from breathing noxious fumes from the oil spill. Reading or hearing the news from the place is so depressing.

It has been reported that millions of pesos are needed to suck all the oil left in the sunken tanker and many millions more to clean up the mess. Petron blames the shipping company for the accident. Lawmakers asked President Macapagal-Arroyo to declare a state of calamity. The Philippine Coast Guard at one time declared that the tanker had sprung a new leak, a claim Petron denied.

It is as if no one knows what is going on and no one is in charge. Before we know it, the oil slick will have spread to nearby provinces, causing greater damage to the ecosystem.

This is not the time for pointing fingers. This is the time to get our act together to solve the problem. We can ask all the “whys” we can think of without figuring out how we can solve the crisis. Guimaras will never be the same again. We can’t bring back its wonders, but we should try to restore whatever we can.

My father may not go fishing anymore, seeing that our town is quite close to Guimaras. I may not taste the fresh catch from the Visayan Sea again. But I can continue to dream of a place where people understand how lives are interconnected and how we should be responsible for each other and for what God has given us.

* Rosanna Naig, 22, is a BA Broadcast Communication graduate of the University of the Philippines-Visayas.

h1

NOAA* RESPONDS TO INTERNATIONAL OIL SPILLS

September 23, 2006

Spills in Lebanon and Philippines Place Natural Resources at Risk

THE NOAA Office of Response and Restoration is working with the U.S. State Department and the U.S. Coast Guard to respond to recent international oil spill emergencies in Lebanon and the Philippines. NOAA’s Scientific Support Coordinators are at the forefront of emergency response efforts providing scientific support and comprehensive solutions to hazardous material releases in the marine environment. oil-spill-philipines-shore-08-2006-resized-1.jpg
A view of oil spill in Panay Gulf, located off the west coast of the central Philippines, photo courtesy NOAA

As the result of an Israeli missile attack on a power plant located on the Mediterranean coast, at least 4.6 million gallons of fuel oil were released into the surrounding coastal waters less than 20 miles south of Beirut, Lebanon. NOAA immediately responded with spill trajectory analyses, seasonal wind statistics, information on the behavior of submerged oil and general information on natural resources potentially at risk from the oil. This information is assisting the United Nations Environmental Program, European oil spill response community, Regional Marine Pollution Emergency Response Center for the Mediterranean Sea, and local Lebanese officials, in developing a cleanup strategy, including ways to address the impacts the oil will have on the region.

In a separate accident in the Philippines, the vessel M/T Solar I, spilled more than 100,000 gallons of fuel [bunker] oil and sank in nearly 2,300 feet of water in the Panay Gulf, located off the west coast of the central Philippines near Nueva Valencia. An additional 450,000 gallons of fuel remain in the vessel risking continued leaching into the Panay Gulf potentially threatening marine life and affecting the coasts of the Panay and Iloilos islands, including sensitive mangrove, seagrass beds and coral reef habitats.

oil-spill-philipines-08-2006-resized-2.jpg
Aerial image of oil spill in Panay Gulf courtesy NOAA.

The State Department forwarded a request for assistance to USCG, which deployed a small contingent from the Pacific Strike Force to evaluate cleanup potential and requirements for spill response. NOAA’s Scientific Support Coordinator for the Northwest and Pacific region joined the USCG Strike Team on August 18 to assist with response. The team conducted observation flights and shoreline surveys to identify oiling locations and develop response cleanup strategies for an area that is underdeveloped with terrain that makes over-ground travel extremely difficult. The U.S. team is working with the Philippine Coast Guard, the oil company, Petron, and their contractors to improve response effectiveness and efficiency.

Currently, the rate of oil released from the vessel continues to decrease. NOAA is actively engaged in discussions to address shoreline cleanup and long-term remediation of oiled mangrove forest habitat.

oil-spill-philipines-ship-08-2006-resized-3.jpg
Ship responds to oil spill in Panay Gulf. Photo courtesy NOAA

There are currently 10 regional Scientific Support Coordinators within the NOAA Office of Response Restoration who organize NOAA resources in support of response efforts, and work with scientists from other public agencies, academia and the private sector to support operations when an oil or chemical spill occurs. Their capabilities include contingency planning; surface/subsurface trajectory forecasting and hindcasting; and resource risk analysis.

The NOAA Office of Response and Restoration supports oil and chemical spill response operations with the scientific recommendations required to reduce both the environmental harm and economic cost of emergencies. The office responds to more than 100 coastal emergencies each year.

In 2007 NOAA, an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department, celebrates 200 years of science and service to the nation. Starting with the establishment of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey in 1807 by Thomas Jefferson much of America’s scientific heritage is rooted in NOAA. The agency is dedicated to enhancing economic security and national safety through the prediction and research of weather and climate-related events and information service delivery for transportation, and by providing environmental stewardship of the nation’s coastal and marine resources. Through the emerging Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS), NOAA is working with its federal partners, more than 60 countries and the European Commission to develop a global monitoring network that is as integrated as the planet it observes, predicts and protects.

* National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

h1

2 lawmakers urge Petron to stop oil leak from Solar I

September 23, 2006

• Drinking water tainted
By Jess Diaz
The Philippine Star 09/23/2006

TWO members of the House energy committee urged Petron Corp. and Sunshine Maritime Development Corp. to immediately take steps to stop the oil leak from the sunken oil tanker MT Solar I.

Representatives Eduardo Veloso of Leyte and Wilhelmino Sy-Alvarado made the appeal in the wake of the revelation of presidential coordinator for Western Visayas Rafael Cosculluela, who is also overall coordinator for “Ligtas Guimaras,” that oil continues to flow from the sunken vessel at a rate of at least 120 liters a day.

“The leak should be stopped once and for all; otherwise the cleanup drive will be useless. We are wasting our time, effort and money on this. While plugging the leak is possible, it seems those concerned are too slow to decide on this,” the two said.

They said the responsibility of Petron and Sunshine, owner of the tanker, does not end with locating the vessel and providing P300 per day for every resident involved in the cleanup.

“The immediate concern now is to stop the leak and protect the environment and the population,” they said.

They added that it should not take a report or a reminder from officials for Petron and Sunshine Maritime Development Corp. to move since it is these entities that should take the initiative.

“The lingering threat to people’s lives and the environment brought about by the oil spill and unabated oil leak should compel these two companies to find ways to hasten siphoning of the remaining oil and stop the leakage. We cannot just sit and wait until all the remaining oil had leaked out. That would mean slow death for the marine resources and livelihood in Guimaras,” they stressed.

The two congressmen pointed out that Petron and Sunshine are lucky since had a similar spill happened in other countries, the culprits would be facing damage suits that could cost them billions.

The country’s laws on oil contamination and pollution are not strict and those polluting the environment get away with their crime easily, they noted.

On Friday, Cebu Rep. Eduardo Gullas urged the Senate to pass a tough anti-oil pollution bill that could deter oil companies and transport companies from destroying the environment.

Gullas said the House passed Bill 4363, or the proposed Oil Pollution Compensation Act, on Nov. 14, 2005 and transmitted it to the Senate that same month.

It has since been awaiting the senators’ action, he said.

The measure, principally authored by Bataan Rep. Antonino Roman, seeks to incorporate as part of Philippine law the provisions of the 1992 International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage and the 1992 International Convention on the Establishment of the International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund (IOPCF).

Under the bill, owners of ships that “cause pollution damage or create a grave and imminent threat of causing such damage” would be liable for expenses incurred in cleanup operations at sea or on shore, costs for preventive measures, loss of earnings suffered by owners or users of contaminated areas, damage to human health or loss of life, and environmental damage and cost of rehabilitation and restoration.

Gullas said Petron is a contributor to the IOPCF and has announced that the fund would make available some $315 million to cover clean-up costs, spoiled property and consequential losses as a result of the Guimaras oil spill.

Oil contamination

Meanwhile, in Iloilo City, health authorities have warned against the intake of water sourced from wells near the coastline after a laboratory exam showed that water and soil samples from three barangays in Guimaras were positive for oil contamination.

Department of Health regional office OIC Dr. Edgardo Gonzaga said yesterday the results of a laboratory examination conducted last Sept. 4-6 showed “really high” levels of polyaromatic hydrocarbons in samples taken from Barangays Tando, Cabalagnan and Lapaz, all in Nueva Valencia town, considered the municipality hardest hit by the oil spill.

Gonzaga advised residents against consuming contaminated water. “They should not get their water from the wells where the samples were taken,” he said.

The DOH plans to conduct another round of tests to see if there have been changes in the level of toxic elements in these areas, he said.

Over the week, the DOH conducted 921 consultations in Guimaras, with respiratory illnesses accounting for 68 percent. Gastrointestinal illnesses, skin and eye irritations account for the rest.

The DOH central office will be sending over replacement cartridges for the half-face masks used by coastal cleaners. The masks protect cleaners against the inhalation of toxic fumes coming from bunker oil. — With Ronilo Pamonag

h1

Biophysical aspects of the Solar I oil spill off Guimaras: A statement

September 23, 2006

The Philippine Star 09/23/2006

THE August 11, 2006 oil spill off Guimaras was such a disaster that it generated unprecedented response, including rapid response from local governments and communities, national government agencies, NGOs and other sectors. However it is a complex problem such that the response should be science-based and properly coordinated.

The oil spill has increased public awareness of oil spills but has also led to many misconceptions. An example of the latter is that the use of dispersants in shallow water habitats and on the organisms themselves is good. There were also contradicting statements issued by certain sectors.

Expertise is available but this needs to be harnessed and coordinated. More than a month after the oil spill, the question remains: Are there sufficient resources for response and mitigation?

Given this situation, we the undersigned:

• Recommend an objective analysis of the technical aspects of the oil spill, its impacts and the response (i.e., the science of an oil spill), so that we may learn from it and minimize impacts of future spills.

• Such analysis will evaluate actual Guimaras events against the established first line of action in preventing arrival of the oil along the shoreline by means of containment and removal while at sea; and failing that, regulated application of acceptable dispersants within hours of the spill event. The decision to use dispersants should be done collectively with proper consultation.

• We strongly recommend that the use of dispersants in shallow water habitats such as mangroves, seagrass beds, and coral communities should be avoided given that bunker fuel is not amenable to treatment with dispersants, the toxic effects of dispersants, and their contribution to spreading the impacts over a wider area.

• In these shoreline habitats, the recommended line of action is mechanical or manual removal (following biosafety protocols) followed by bioremediation, in that order. The application of bioremediating agents should follow assessment protocols under the supervision of DOST, DENR and UP Visayas. Application of approved bioremediation could entail simple addition of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers in appropriate doses at appropriate times, as in the successful case studies of the 1978 Amoco Cadiz and 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spills.

• We recommend that a national protocol for responding to spills be formulated with clear responsibilities, accountability, and transparency of the agencies identified.

• We support the designation of the University of the Philippines in the Visayas as the coordinating institution for research.

• We also urge the authorities to remove the remaining oil in the sunken vessel as soon as possible given the likely complications that will occur with the impending shift in the monsoon winds. Note that the option of pumping out of oil is associated with many risks.

• All this must be done with renewed sense of urgency given the likelihood that additional delay until the Northeast monsoon season will further spread the oil to the south and west of Guimaras Strait – to similarly critical areas unaffected so far. This will exacerbate the situation with regards to the environment, and consequently livelihood and human health.

*Signed by the Participants of the Scientific Meeting on the Biophysical Aspects of the Solar I-Oil Spill off Guimaras, this 15th day of September 2006 at the SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department, Tigbauan, Iloilo